On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:37:16 Bjorn Tillenius wrote: > Hi, > > I took a look at the current Memcached work, and saw the merge proposal > for the TAL API. I took a look at the current API, and while it looks > nice and easy to use, I can't really tell whether it's a good or bad > API. I can't tell, since I don't really know what we want to use > Memcached for. > > I know that we want to cache parts of the page, but that's pretty vague. > I do know that one thing that we want to cache is the rendering of bug > comments, since that's pretty safe to cache, and they are expensive to > render. What else are we wanting to cache? When can we consider this > done, from a Foundations point of view? > > Personally I'd like to at least see bug comments cached. There are a > different ways this can be done, and I'd be interested to know how the > current API design was decided upon. What other options were considered, > and why were they abandoned? >
There is the tag cloud for code.launchpad.net/projects. That would make a great first test for memcached AFAICT. Tim _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
