Micah Gersten wrote: > Max, > Here's the patch you need: > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/xulrunner/xulrunner-1.9.2.head/annotate/head%3A/debian/patches/fix-build-glitch.patch
Ah, thanks. Matches what I independently came up with :-) I've debugged the underlying cause and will be submitting a patch to make upstream and Debian. > Also, are you planning on including this in the archive or just the PPA? For the purposes of the archive, I have this bug open: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9.2/+bug/536950 I'd love to not have to maintain this in the PPA, but asac's comment in that bug doesn't sound very positive. Max. > On 03/12/2010 08:21 PM, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Julian Edwards wrote: >>> So it looks like we need to revert to using the slow rhino. >> >> I've figured out a evil/clever hack to build a spidermonkey-bin in >> lucid :-) >> >> 1) The Debian packaging of xulrunner is completely unrelated to the >> Ubuntu packaging. >> >> 2) ... and it still builds js/spidermonkey. >> >> 3) js/spidermonkey despite building from the xulrunner source, doesn't >> depend on it. >> >> 4) Therefore just build the Debian xulrunner source in Ubuntu, having >> first hacked out the final building of all the .debs except the >> spidermonkey ones :-) >> >> I'll get it into the Launchpad PPA once I've worked around an >> architecture-specific bug in make or dash that's causing it to FTBFS on >> amd64.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
