On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 14:57 +0000, Julian Edwards wrote: > On Tuesday 16 March 2010 14:49:33 Ursula Junque wrote: > > Curtis Hovey wrote: > > > http://people.canonical.com/~lpqateam/test-plan-report-10.03.html > > > says the registry has a bad item. I do not know of one and I cannot find > > > it. How can I find this bug that appears to be my team's responsibility? > > > > > > http://tiny.cc/wERuP shows all qa-bad bugs in the launchpad-project for > > > all bug statuses. None of the bugs relate to the registry project or > > > team. > > > > This has been sorted out and I've replied Curtis yesterday: the script > > was considering a person in Registry when the person was Foundations. > > This was spurious, the chart is correct since then. > > > > To check your QA items of this cycle, I've prepared a "cheat sheet" [1] > > with the queries. Hope this helps! > > > > [1] > > https://dev.launchpad.net/PolicyAndProcess/PreReleaseQAProcess/Experiment/Q > > ueryList > > The way we do this QA now really obviates the need to put bug tags on the > milestone listings (I stare at the current Soyuz milestone all day). > > This was done a while ago but got reverted, I can't remember why. Can we get > it back?
Not without a lot of work. Tags are expensive db calls that cause timeouts for small and large projects. This requires an async call to load, and I think we all know that ajax is 4 magnitudes or more greater than adding the info to the template. -- __Curtis C. Hovey_________ http://launchpad.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
