Jeroen Vermeulen <j...@canonical.com> writes: >I don't think I follow the argument here. What kind of trust are you >talking about? If it's trust in honesty on our part, viewers already >have to trust that we deploy the same code we publish, with no hidden >tricks. If it's trust in timely synchronization, we have logs. > >If it's trust in us making faithful copies, well, if there's a >password on the master then the owner clearly wants it restricted. So >the question of trust lies on that side, not on ours.
Oh, I didn't mean trust in the sense of worrying about malicious intent. I more meant trust in the sense of "one can independently verify that Launchpad's mirror of the code is complete and up-to-date with respect to the upstream repository" -- i.e., that no technical glitches have occurred. -Karl _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : launchpad-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
