On June 11, 2010, Graham Binns wrote: > On 11 June 2010 16:29, Francis J. Lacoste <[email protected]> > > Now, status changing and other such notifications are probably not > > conversation but should be thought as a status notification and as such > > should probably use a robot address (so [email protected] is probably > > appropriate). > > Why not <[email protected]>? That's what gets used now for > notifications not associated with a person, or triggered by a person > with no preferred email address, or a person with private email > addresses. >
Yes, what you are suggesting is what I meant. > > Now, what about the case where we batch changes together, we should > > probably inspire ourselves from mailing digest then. And that's probably > > a robot adress again. > > > > But I'd really like that we keep using the poster email for comments, > > which makes sense given that those can be triggered by an email in the > > first place. > > I can sort of see the argument here for using the user's preferred > email address, but there's still a slight (only slight) whiff of > Launchpad spoofing the email. I don't think it matters to be honest, it allows people using the web and email to interoperate in a transparent manner. We may want to use additional warnings like we do on the Contact a user feature to distinguish between comments posted via the web. And people will always complain:-) -- Francis J. Lacoste [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
