On 2 July 2010 20:46, Stuart Bishop <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Danilo Šegan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I can imagine it being much easier for simpler schema extensions, but I >> ain't gonna go through the effort while there is db-devel around. :) > > In a lot of ways, the way we have devel/stable/db-devel/db-stable > setup we are meeting a lot of the points mentioned in the article. We > do deploy trunk (edge and staging), exposing new stuff to a subset of > users for testing (edge, while the article prefers configuration and > the mess of 'if then else' code and the extra costs that creates with > your test suite, which wasn't mentioned - most web applications don't > have them).
One big difference is that changes in Launchpad seem to be largely all-at-once and irrevocable except for emergencies that justify a rollback. -- Martin _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
