On Sunday 25 July 2010 23:30:46 Tim Penhey wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 04:42:53 Francis J. Lacoste wrote: > > We should support: > > > > * The latest stable release (what LP devs use) > > * The latest LTS release (what the server should be running) > > * The LTS release in production (because sometime, like now, that's now > > actually the latest LTS release) > > s/now/not/ ? > > > * The latest development release (because many Ubuntu dev are actually > > running that, and the LP dev upgrade at beta time) > > +1 > > This makes sense to me.
I don't think we should waste resources supporting the latest dev release until it approaches its first beta. It's such a fast-moving target until that point. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
