On Thursday 05 August 2010 16:24:05 Aaron Bentley wrote: > On 08/05/2010 11:18 AM, James Westby wrote: > >>>> - SPR - already NULLable, so again it's just that we could have an > >>>> > >>>> SPR that we don't know the origin of any more. > >>>> > >>>> - SourcePackageRecipeBuildJob - prevent deletion? > >> > >> I would probably warn, the way we do on branch deletion, and then delete > >> if the user decided to proceed. > > > > I assumed this was parallel to PackageBuild that Julian was saying > > should prevent deletion. Can we go ahead and just delete > > SourcePackageRecipeBuildJob? > > It's a linking table between SourcePackageRecipeBuild and Job. > Equivalent to BuildPackageJob. I don't agree with Julian that > PackageBuild should prevent deletion.
Sorry, I meant: BuildPackageJob, BuildQueue and Job, which are only present when a build job is in the queue. > I think that if you're aware that > there are outstanding builds for the archive you want to delete, and you > choose to delete it anyway, that should delete the outstanding builds. As I said previously, which you may have missed before I CC'ed you on the thread, we can't do that yet because it leaves us with a stuck builder. If we can fix bug 463046 first then this would be fine. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
