On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Julian Edwards <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 19 August 2010 10:38:48 Stuart Bishop wrote: >> Sugar was offering some SQLObject like extensions is not used. I >> personally felt we would be better off without them and we should just >> do things the Storm preferred way or get the improvements in Storm >> core. In particular, it hard codes 'id' as an integer primary key >> which is no longer the case. > > I completely agree. > > We should be looking to use Storm and pushing upstream to improve it, not > creating yet more local changes.
Absolutely. Creating a default implementation of a hook which links into a non-storm facility is hardly a local change though. -Rob _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
