On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 13:17 -0500, Edwin Grubbs wrote: > For public projects, it makes some sense to allow the project owner to > lose access to an artefact. For example, if the owner is not > subscribed to a private bug.
"Some sense" in the sense that there is not true owner of a public project? That many people autonomously work on the project and no one person is responsible for it? This is true. I think we need to consider the uses/needs for privacy in public projects...that will be issue 5 that I send out tomorrow. -- __Curtis C. Hovey_________ http://launchpad.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
