On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Aaron Bentley <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/08/2010 10:33 AM, Michael Nelson wrote: >> The only implication, aiui, was that they wouldn't benefit from >> seeing their new build types in the builder histories until their >> relevant part of the refactoring was done. > > Right, and we didn't consider that optional, so we had to follow what > you'd done.
Sure - not optional, but I wouldn't think it was being "*forced* to scramble and update their part because that was required to fix some breakage". Other types of builds had never been part of the builder histories/ppa histories before - it was new functionality. But that's helpful for me to know it was perceived that way. Sorry for any pain inflicted. Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
