On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Julian Edwards <[email protected]> wrote: > I did read below but I'm not sure of the significance (if any) of this being > an SQLObject-style model class.
There is no significance - SQLObject style classes are no worse (or better) than raw storm ones. As Gavin says the columnID convention was SQLObject magic which was reimplemented for the storm migration. > Does the same thing happen with Storm-style ones, and we'd need to reference > bugtask.distribution_id ? Absolutely. Basically the default for comparisons should be the _id or ID field, only actual deferencing should use the ReferenceColumn attribute. > While I'm thinking about it, why do we have this inconsistency between > field_id and fieldID for Storm vs SQLObject? Storm wasn't built to be a SQLObject replacement, so its idioms and documentation are different. -Rob _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
