On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Robert Collins <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like to cleanup our tags a little - we have 151 official tags. I > don't mean to stop folk using arbitrary tags, just make the set we're > /working with/ a little clearer and crisper: I don't think there is a > lot of value making every single thing have a blessed tags. We should > have tags for broad areas and for current LEPs. >
Agreed. > Please either ignore this mail (and I'll act on it next week). Or > reply telling my part of it is a problem so I can revise my proposal > and/or do things differently. > Are you aware of <https://dev.launchpad.net/LaunchpadBugTags>? Are you planning on updating that as well? > I'd like add the following official tags (helping to separate things): > branches > codehosting > publish > registry > security > soyuz > stakeholder > translations > I don't understand the thinking behind this list. Why pick "soyuz" as a tag when there are many components that make it up? What does "registry" mean? ... > I'd like to delete the following tags as seeming not carrying enough > use to be *official tags* in the project - they would stay on the > relevant bugs, but not be always shown in the portlet, nor be offered > in typeahead in the bug tags widget. > A lot of these are cleanups which are obviously good ideas. I don't know what criteria you are using to decide that one tag is worthy of being official and another is not. Why is 'canonical-losa-lp' to stay official but 'oem-services' not? Why is 'patch-tracking' not worthy of being official when 'codehosting' is? You say "broad area" above, but I would have thought that "bug tags" were a broad area. jml _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
