On 07/06/11 18:27, Graham Binns wrote: > On 7 June 2011 07:40, William Grant <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 07/06/11 15:21, William Grant wrote: >>> [snip undue optimism] >>> r13162 is currently being deployed to nodowntime, so we will just be >>> deploying the merge revision and the two RC fixes during downtime. >>> Assuming nothing goes wrong, the advanced bug subscriptions work will be >>> turned on for everyone a couple of hours after we come back up. >> >> And so the saga continues. Turns out r13154 was bad for the third time >> (see comments #7 and #8 in >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/772609). It has been reverted >> in r13168. So we have to deploy at least that. > > At this stage I don't think we should attempt to land a working > version of that patch - it's obvious that there are some holes in our > test coverage - either big or subtle - and I don't particularly want > to have to do this whole dance again on a tight timeframe. The fix for > 772609 can be rolled out without downtime later.
Agreed. It's not essential, and we are already cutting it fine. I also think it's likely that the holes are big *and* subtle.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
