On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 22:41 -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm not too sure I agree with this massive expiration on the bug > reports. Just because there was no activity for 60 days doesn't make > the bug invalid. Lots of people have very large queues, and won't be > getting to it for a while. The bugs still do exist and this is making > it appear as though they are insignificant or unnecessary.
It is very apparent that some additional constraints are needed in addition to the discussion of the period of INCOMPLETE and UNASSIGNED. We are preparing a restore of bugs that are duplicates, have milestones, have recent comments, or one of the affected locations has an upstream bugwatch. -- __Curtis C. Hovey_________ http://launchpad.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- launchpad-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/launchpad-users
