At a LV training session, I heard that when LV was initially being developed, some of its code writers wrote assuming column based arrays while others wrote for row. When they got together they discovered they would need a Transpose Array function.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Ross, Michael > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 8:51 AM > Subject: RE: Array Wish list > > I have a paper and spreadsheet based malady - I think in > columns, but LV > (at least initially) thinks in rows. I suspect this is based on > familiarity with database structure (database records are rows) on the > part those who made software design choices for LV early on. I always > assumed that or something inherent in digital number > crunching that makes > rows function better.
