[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:04:33 -0800 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>. I agree with Lott. This one is certainly
>>not like Anita Hill.
>
>Bill: You really don't agree with Sen Lott, a Republican conservative,
>do
>you? I think his statement that this is not an Anita Hill, means that
>there
>are much more substantial allegations against Clinton, than the
>offense that
>Anita Hill took at Clarence Thomas' sexual innuendo jokes.
>
>Ron
HI Ron,
LOL...gee, is that like the criticism the right wingers are launching at
NOW and other feminists concerning their support of Anita Hill and their
lack of support for Paula Jones.
Gee, did Senator Lott back ol Clarence Thomas against Anita Hill
for....hmmm....political reasons? And now he's backing Jones et al
for....hmm...political reasons. As usual, Lott and others apply a very
convenient double standard here.
And to diminish Hill's accusations to taking offense at sexual innuendo
jokes is to completely mis-state the issues in her case.
I agree with Lott. The Clinton situation is nothing like the Anita Hill
situation. Unless you want to include the political motives of those on
both sides.
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
