Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Doc
Thanks for the info. I wanted to be sure of where the court now stands. I was
talking about the decision on the case Sue posted and didn't make myself as clear
as I should. I knew that some states permit it, but many do not because there is
such a debate on its reliability.
jackief
jackief
DocCec wrote:
> DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> In a message dated 98-04-01 07:52:28 EST, you write:
>
> << Hi Sue
>
> Thanks for ferreting out pertinent info. for all of us. I am not sure I
> read this right--my eyes might be biased <VBG>, but it seems the Supreme
> court is not willing to accept the idea that the polygraph is admissible.
> Am I correct in this??
>
> jackief >>
>
> Per WashPost this am -- Supreme Court has ruled that states may (not must, but
> may) refuse to allow polygraph results as proof in court.
> Doc
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
