Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
Thanks. :) I knew it was a far out idea, but just was wondering.
Also I have been wondering about something else, just as far out. Since
the affidavits involved in this whole thing (where Clinton supposidly
lied) were part of the Jones case, and that case has been thrown out,
are the affidavits still valid. Or were they thrown out along with the
case? I hope I am getting my question across. <BG>
Sue
>
> Hi Sue,
>
> No, she would have no grounds for a lawsuit because her contempt of court
> was well within the law. She was held in contempt for refusing to
> testify before the Grand Jury after being given use immunity. In those
> cases the person has no choice. Testify or be held in contempt.
>
> Bill
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
