Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Dr. L.:
Do you have the date on this?
If you go to http://www.ca.gov/s/govt/judicial.html you can get any
opinion from the Ca courts. I am going through a list now to see if I
can find the names you put on here.
Sue
>
> Hello Doctor,
>
> If it was covered by Court TV then it is likely that they have the case
> on it's web site archives. You can check there to see if they have
> transcripts and the results of evidentiary rulings. Many times they will
> have a link to this information and not limit their data to the verdict
> only. If it's not on there you may simply try sending an e-mail to the
> Court TV staff citing the case and asking them what the judge ruled with
> respect to that evidence.
>
> Another source would be the local newspapers for that city, which are
> probably on the net. But you'd have to search via key word in order to
> find it.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Bill
>
> On Tue, 10 Mar 1998 16:28:06 -0800 "Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >"Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >Bill - your post is intriguing. Re California v. Bray and Ayers, Yes,
> >Courttv. Is it really possible to find out how particular sub-rulings
> >come out, on the Internet? This was such an interesting interplay on
> >the
> >issue of whether computer logs to the 'self' vary from diaries; I
> >don't
> >think I'll hear how the judge rules, as they have moved on to other
> >forensic issues as to what was discovered on the premises including
> >but
> >not limited to disks that were lying around; please post if there is a
> >way to follow up, as I only thought one could look up final verdicts
> >on
> >their website. :) LDMF.
>
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
