"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: And, of course, even if the Jones ruling is overturned they will still have to convince a jury with respect to liability. But we all know that the people behind Jones are not as concerned about a successful verdict as they are about continuing the political damage against the president. Bill What evidence is there that Starr has done ANY political damage to the President? Absolutely none, as indicated by your polls themselves he is undamaged, and if any political damage comes of this, it will be of Clinton's own making, not Starr's. Ron 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
