Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
So then it comes back to what is Starr going to do now that there are
so many people (in high places) telling him to bring an end to this.
How is he going to handle all these people if he has to fight it out in
court in order to get Clinton to be subpoenaed, or work out a deal with
him that takes months. And if Ginsburg is making him work for Monica's
testimony, which could also take months.
Perhaps the best thing that Starr could do would be to honor the
immunity thing he offered, if he did offer it, and that could force
Clinton to testify.
Or could he take it before the impeachment panel without Clinton ever
testifying at all.
Sue
>
> Hi Sue,
>
> Starr won't be able to do this, IMO. If Clinton decides to fight the
> subpoena it would take months before the courts decided the issue on
> whether he should be forced to testify. More likely is that Starr's
> people will work with Clinton's people to come to an agreement as to the
> terms of his testifying before the Grand Jury. And for sure Lewinsky
> will go first. Which brings us back to the contention by Ginsberg that
> Starr offered her full immunity and should honor that agreement. This
> could take months to sort out anyway.
>
> Bill
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
