"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>What about the problem of mets, Ron? Will they have to discover and
isolate
>every metastatic tumor? Or will this really only be good for a primary or
in
>situ that hasn't metastasized yet?
>Doc
Metastases usually do not exhibit the angioneogenesis that the primary tumor
does, therefore I would guess that this process would only really be
beneficial in shutting down the blood supply to the primary tumor. Many
tumors do not metastasize, and spread by local invasion, or local spread...a
good example being the most common of ovarian cancers which implants on
peritoneal surfaces. Ron
99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, May 05, 1998 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: L&I A Very Cruel Hoax
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-05-05 11:45:14 EDT, you write:
>
><< Actually it has been known for years that angioneogenesis ( the
> proliferation of blood vessels ) is characteristic of solid tumors. Many
> have been working on this idea, but this has apparently been the first
> successful inhibition of the process, at least in mice. Apparently these
> investigators have isolated a factor that stimulates the process and have
> successfully inhibited this factor in mouse tumors. >>
>
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
