Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
Could be. LOL Seriously he talks about universes, black holes, and
other things with long names that I can't even begin to pronounce much
less spell. Then just to confuse the issue with me he throws in these
mathematical things which really throws me off. I had a hard time with
algebra and here he goes with this quantum physics stuff. <BG> If it
isn't a cc or mL, or something like that, it is beyond me.
I do agree that there is more than likely life somewhere out there. But
I honestly don't think that it has ever been here. But since I am going
only by the fact that I have never seen any evidence to prove it, I
wouldn't even bet my life on that.
Sue
>
> HI Sue,
>
> He's probably referring to the large numbers of planets like earth that
> have all the physical parameters that we recognize as being essential to
> supporting some form of life. Of course, even this understates the
> probability because that only covers life forms as WE know them. IMO, it
> is the almost inconceivable size of the universe that makes it almost a
> certainty that other life forms do exist. And it is the same
> inconceivable size that makes me think that none of these life forms have
> likely been anywhere near our planet.
>
> Bill
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues