Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But Sue we already know that statement is false, her and Clinton both
admit they met that day. So now I'm left wondering why did they want her
to sign a statement saying she didn't meet with anyone? There is
something fishy going on I'm just not sure what it is. Yet there has to
be a reason they wanted her to say she didn't meet with anyone.
Sue Hartigan wrote:
>
> Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi Kathy:
>
> According to the lawyer who is handling the case for the clients her
> husband stole the money from, Kathleen made a sworn statement which said
> the on the day of her husband's death she went to the WH to do her daily
> job, and talked to no one there that day. She is also still legally
> responsible for the money that her husband stole which is in the
> neighborhood of 30 thousand dollars. And the clients are actively
> trying to recover it.
>
> I got this off of Bryant Gumbles show last night, where the attorney
> appeared with the sworn statement of Kathleen's. :(
--
Kathy E
"I can only please one person a day, today is NOT your day, and tomorrow
isn't looking too good for you either"
http://members.delphi.com/kathylaw/ Law & Issues Mailing List
http://pw1.netcom.com/~kathye/rodeo.html - Cowboy Histories
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/2990/law.htm Crime photo's
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
