moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Evenin, If Clinton's sexual past is fair game in showing a pattern of behavior in the case of Jones v. Clinton and Jones claims she now has a "sexual aversion" despite having sex anyway then why cannot her sexual history be used to refute her claim? ...Mac Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory moonshine
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory hallinan
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory DocCec
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory DocCec
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory hallinan
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory DocCec
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory DocCec
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory William J. Foristal