moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Evenin,
    If Clinton's sexual past is fair game in showing a pattern of behavior in the case
of Jones v. Clinton and Jones claims she now has a "sexual aversion" despite having
sex anyway then why cannot her sexual history be used to refute her claim?
 ...Mac


Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to