On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:51:48 -0300 "Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Mattias Gaertner > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, that would not be OS X like. > > > > (Personally I agree: jump to eol is more common than eof, so eol > > should get the shorter shortcut) I forgot: There is Cmd+Left/Right, so jumping to eol and eof have both 2 key shortcuts. > Ummm ... yes, it would not be what OS X proposes that we do, but the > Mac guidelines are not meant to be a rigid constrainment, we should > analise that in some cases their proposal is not the best solution for > us, like OpenOffice did. They do use Apple+C for copy, but use END to > go to the end of the line. Of course not rigid. But the more commonly used the more rigid. Yes, it is hard for windows/linux users. But it is the same for apple users and windows shortcuts. > Now I see that Apple+arrows does this, but it annoys me that the key > combinations are so different from what I am used in Windows. Using > the Windows style doesn't help, because then I need to use Ctrl > instead of Apple for copy+paste, which is a annoying when all programs > use Apple. > > > Pressing 'a' works here. > > Now it works here too. It seams to give problems only sometimes, still > haven't found a reliable way to reproduce ... OS X knows some keyboard modes. Maybe you activated it somehow (Ctrl keys). Mattias _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
