On 2016-08-14 10:32, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: > Is that as expected? I’m not using VirtualTreeview myself, but as someone that works on multiple large frameworks, I could make a personal observation. A jump from v4.8 to v5.5 seems like a major jump (a major version change, and multiple minor version increases), and if lots of new functionality was added (and no major refactoring was done) it seems logical that the binary size increases. More code equals larger binaries. If the functionality added is worth the 1.2MB binary increase? That’s for you to decide. If you are happy with the workings of v4.8 and require a smaller binary size, then simply stay with v4.8.
Regards, Graeme -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/ My public PGP key: http://tinyurl.com/graeme-pgp -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
