Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

[denisgolovan via Lazarus]

Hi Luiz Americo Pereira Camara

 

Maybe it's better to keep standard git naming like master (for current), and simple branches like v4,v5,v6,... as necessary?

 

Why having non-standard lazarus_master in _new_ repo?

Is existing master just an old "history"?

 

Please keep it simple.

 

 

22.11.2016, 20:28, "Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus" <lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>:

Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port.

In Lazarus-CCR:

virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained
virtualtreeview-new: original repository of the current port

In GitHub:
https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus : active repository of current port

Some history how we got that: http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,26581.msg174292.html#msg174292

In order to bring some sanity, i added a note in the Lazarus-CCR/virtualtreeview-new repository about its deprecation.The idea is to remove in the near future. The development history, for any need, will be kept at https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus-History

I don't own rights about of Lazarus-CCR/virtualtreeview repository so not comfortable in taking any decision about it. I will let for Lazarus-CCR admins decide what to do with it

Luiz

,--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

-- 
Regards,

Denis Golovan

-- 
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
http://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus