> Respectfully, I believe the current underlying implementation of Gtk3 is > fundamentally a bad design making it unnecessarily difficult to work with. I > do not see it being completed and see its poor design as a large part of the > reason it has been languishing for so long. Could you be more specific about "current underlying implementation of Gtk3"? Do you mean current in-master or the one Michael just publish at foundation site? -- Regards, Denis Golovan -- _______________________________________________ lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
- [Lazarus] More Gtk3 Status Anthony Walter via lazarus
- Re: [Lazarus] More Gtk3 Status denisgolovan via lazarus
- Re: [Lazarus] More Gtk3 Status Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus
- Re: [Lazarus] More Gtk3 Stat... denisgolovan via lazarus
- Re: [Lazarus] More Gtk3 Stat... Anthony Walter via lazarus
- Re: [Lazarus] More Gtk3 ... denisgolovan via lazarus
- Re: [Lazarus] More ... Anthony Walter via lazarus
- Re: [Lazarus] M... denisgolovan via lazarus
- Re: [Lazarus] M... Kostas Michalopoulos via lazarus
- Re: [Lazaru... Anthony Walter via lazarus
- Re: [Lazarus] M... zeljko via lazarus
- Re: [Lazaru... Petr Hložek via lazarus
- Re: [Lazaru... Marco van de Voort via lazarus
- Re: [Lazaru... Marc Weustink via lazarus
- Re: [Lazaru... Anthony Walter via lazarus
- Re: [Lazaru... Alexey Torgashin via lazarus