El 27/3/23 a les 16:50, Michael Van Canneyt ha escrit:


Ehm. In case of an exception, ut will never be freed ?

That's what I said.
I was looking for a way to free it *and* raise the exception in the context of the main thread. If I move the ut.free before the raise, the exception has already been freed and it's invalid, causing a sigsev, if I enclose it in a try..finally the exception handler will be called after the finally has freed the thread (and the exception, so it's the same problem).

Normally, I'd do

Raise Exception(ut.fatalexception.classtype).Create(ut.fatalexception.message);

Actually I'd have to first create the exception, then free ut, then raise the exception (keep in mind that FatalException is a TObject and it isn't necessarily of class Exception), otherwise a direct raise as you wrote would not free ut.

  MyException:=nil;
  if ut.FatalException<>nil then
  begin
     if ut.FatalException is Exception then

MyException:=Exception(ut.FatalException).Create(Exception(ut.FatalException).message)
     else
       MyException:=Exception.create(ut.FatalException.ClassName);
  end;
  ut.free;
  if MyException<>nil then
    raise MyException;



But it still doesn't work, since this way MyException is a copy of FatalException (i.e. it's no different than MyException:=Exception(ut.FatalExcaption), so freeing ut, which in turn frees ut.FatalException, makes it invalid and causes a sigsev.

The best I could do is store the exception message and raise a new one.

Bye
--
Luca Olivetti
Wetron Automation Technology http://www.wetron.es/
Tel. +34 93 5883004 (Ext.3010)  Fax +34 93 5883007

--
_______________________________________________
lazarus mailing list
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to