Martin escribió: > > Then later mails (other people) developped into statements like "The > debugger is not usable as it does not have been in the focus to be > developed. " or " lack elemental features that are waiting to be > implemented and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting"; And then > soon saying this was a reason for people not to use Lazarus, or to > move away from Lazarus. I apologize if my message seemed aggressive or hostile, I was just translating a comment not written by me. Any how, I think that the paragraph was related to OSS in general, not to Lazarus. > My view is, that once such a feature has been done/contributed, it > should be disabled by default, but when you attempt to evaluate a > property, you can be asked (with propper warnings) if you want to > enable it. > On the other hand, my opinion is that such feature should be enabled by default, as far as I know, no one has ever had a problem with that in delphi. I think you are too cautious disabling such property, or even warning. It is not that dangerous.
Sorry once again if it looked that I don't appreciate your work or Lazarus as it is now. In fact I use Lazarus now. Santiago A. s...@ciberpiula.net -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus