Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb: > Florian Klaempfl wrote: >> I know how much happened, when I see some revision numbers, when seeing > > > No you don't. One patch could have been a one-liner fix, the next patch > could have added full .NET support to FPC. So you know two commits > happened,
This is already a lot more of free info than git provides. > but the number two doesn't tell you how much has changed. If I > wanted to know how many commits occurred between two commits (God only know > why I would want to know that), Git could tell me that too. > > Anyway, we are getting way off topic here and it's pointless discussing > this further. Well, I don't wonder, you always tell us how great git is but at every thing I look, it plainly sucks: - git svn - line feed handling (how can I do it failsafe?) - merging (how do I merge blocking?) - handling of empty directories - tortoisegit (ever used tortoisesvn?) Of course, it's all my fault that I don't see the use of the unix script hackery called git. So you can continue to ignore the concerns and we will continue to use svn :) -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
