Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb: > Florian Klaempfl wrote: >> Years of experience with fpc showed that very few people are testing >> such branches. Even rcs aren't intensively tested, just look at the >> resource trouble with fpc 2.4.0 > > Not to get into all that again (you can read the archives),
Yes, you showed that you have neither a clue about subversion nor git ... > but SubVersion > doesn't lend itself to easily using branches. ... or did you ever here that Subversion has a switch command to switch easily and cheap between branches? Apparently not ... The 2.4.0 release candidates were binary so the whole chain has been tested, but even the Linus fud believers could use your git branch. Nobody did so however and found the issues with the resources which probably requires 2.4.2 asap. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
