On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:47:22 +0200 Bernd <[email protected]> wrote:
> We could even establish an open standard for such debug monitoring on > linux because there doesn't seem to be one already. Most likely because noone ever missed it. But this is just my personal opinion and I prefer using gdb directly and seldom use it from within lazarus. And writeln() or debugln() are good enough for my debugging output needs. a...@b:~$ ./myprog >> debug.log works quite well, too. Why I need a program (debug monitor) to capture stdout output is beyond me. So please enlighten me. What are the benefits of such a debug monitor? Perhaps I am missing something. R. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
