On 8/24/11, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[email protected]> wrote: > This is the bug report which brought this issue up: > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19638 > And there I already spoke about the subject.
I know, but since I was instructed otherwise in the past I would like to know the opinion of other devels. > The main issue here for me is that having issues with waiting patches > assigned to people without commit rights will cause confusion: One > cannot easily see which patches are unassigned, unless you have a list > of who are the developers without commit rights. So I propose to use > option 4: Set the target and unassign the issue. I would think moving to "Patches" (with or without unassigning) would be even more indicative? >> B.t.w. Is it OK to set the current trunk (currently 0.9.31) as target? > > No, only future releases should be targets, so the nearest possible > target is 0.9.99 and this should be the target for any issue with a > valid patch 0.99.0 or 0.99.1? I can see no 0.9.99 ;-) Besides, if "we" can agree about the issue, the wiki page can be updated accordingly. Bart -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
