> 2011/10/12 Gregory M. Turner < g...@malth.us >

> > Ah, fantastic, thanks. Only problem is when I do that all my design
> > packages stay as "install next time" or whatever it's called,
> > forever. But don't worry about that. I'll solve this problem the
> > old-fashioned way -- by playing video games until somebody else
> > fixes it for me :)
> 

> Another option is to use a SVN revision that works, in this case max.
> r32815. :)

> About the reasons for the changes:

> First, I removed examples from the Build Lazarus dialog to fix this
> issue:
> 20261: When I try to Start Lazarus I get TrackBar Demo program.
> IMO it was a wrong place for the examples anyway, that was another
> reason to remove it.

Sounds pretty reasonable to me.  Anyhow it seems very likely that the problem 
with trunk, and the 20261 problem (which I suffered from when I was trying the 
Win64 snapshot) are both just symptoms of the same underlying bug, which as I 
described seems to pertain to -olazarus.new.exe being in idemake.cfg when it 
shouldn't be (or perhaps to @idemake.cfg being applied to builds it shouldn't 
be, depending on the intended design).  So your changes may very well be 
completely orthogonal to the real problem, even if they do break the standard 
work-around.

> I guess I must revert the changes and find the problems without
> hurry.

As you mention, I could just roll back.  Wages of centralized version control, 
I guess.  If you see a light at the end of the tunnel, I certainly wouldn't 
want you to waste your development man-hours poring over svn merges on my 
account.  Then again if you've painted yourself into a corner, by all means 
feel free to blame me for the revert commit :)

-gmt

--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to