On 26-2-2012 16:56, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:17:48 +0100 > Reinier Olislagers <reinierolislag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Wouldn't it make more sense to store the Tools/Run Parameters in the >> .lps/session file instead of the lpi file? >> Each developer may have their own aspect of the application they're >> testing and can therefore have different needs. > > True.
>> Would writing a patch be worthwhile? A quick search on mantis on "run >> parameters" gave no results... > > Yes. > Keep in mind: > - Many developers use both the released IDE and the trunk IDE. So > if possible try to keep backward compatibility. Simply moving a value > from lpi to lps breaks this. > - Often it is needed to have various sets of run/debug parameters. > Often these are not the same as "build modes", so they should be a > separate set. Maybe they can be called "run modes". > - All settings in the run parameters dialog should go into that. > - the build modes solves the backward issue, by saving the first build > mode always at the old place of the lpi. For every other build > mode the user can choose where to store it - the lpi or lps. Thanks, Mattias... seems there's quite some things to take into account... I'll open an issue for it at least.. Regards, Reinier -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
