Am 28.02.2012 14:00, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 02/28/2012 10:24 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 28.02.2012 08:22, schrieb Michael Schnell:
In my projects I usually do something like "Type ByteString =
AnsiString" for a future migration :) .
type
TByteArray = array of Byte;
???
array of Byte <> AnsiString.
Yes, but you wrote this:
It would be better to have a type that 1:1 allows for all the well known
string operations, replacing "Character" by "Byte":
And I simply demonstrated that this is already possible in FPC today
(with TByteArray being the replacement for AnsiString).
You can't do "+", there is not TByteArrayList, ...
Did you even look at my code? All the remarks you wrote in your last
mail except "Pos" I had tackled in there. And writing a TByteArrayList
shouldn't be that hard either...
Regards,
Sven
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
