On 10 April 2012 12:28, Marcos Douglas <m...@delfire.net> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Frank Church <vfcli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> When I need a variation in procedures (standalone, not a class or >> object procedure) I use across my applications, I often find it more >> convenient to create a copy the unit into the project folder and make >> the changes there. Sometimes they get merged back into the shared unit >> or not at all. >> >> I am thinking now of using classes with procedures, without any data >> in them, so that I subclass them in the projects where I need to >> change them. Are the some good examples and some known good working >> practices on working with procedures in this way? > > I do this. Sometimes I prefer encapsulate subroutines (LCL, RTL, 3rd > etc) in static classes. > > TmyFoo = class > public > class procedure Exec; static; > end; >
Do you have some examples to show how it is done? Are there some examples in the FCL/LCL etc > Marcos Douglas > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- Frank Church ======================= http://devblog.brahmancreations.com -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
