Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
On 2012-09-18 09:36:02 +0000, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:02:30 +0200Chavoux Luyt <chav...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Leonardo> > On 17 September 2012 13:53, Leonardo M. Ramé <l.r...@griensu.com> wrote:> > > On 2012-09-17 09:18:22 +0000, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:>
> > Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:> > > >> > > >I've installed FPC 2.7.1 from sources and Lazarus also from> > > >sources.> >
> >> >> Just one question: Are you sure Lazarus works with FPC2.7.1? I got the idea> that it only works with FPC2.6? I might be wrong and it might not be
a> problem when installing from source, though. Just an idea to check.
There were some fpc 2.7.1 revisions that didn't work with Lazarus, butusually
and currently it does.
I don't know whether this helps, but overnight I've built Lazarus
trunk (r38724) on FPC 2.7.1 (r22414) for 32-bit PPC on Debian and
basic operation appears OK.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
I've compiled FPC Trunk from 10 minutes ago, also updated Lazarus SVN
Trunk and compiled. I'm getting some linking errors.
Here's the result:
...
Linking ../startlazarus
/usr/bin/ld: saltando el /opt/gnome/lib//libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so
incompatible mientras se buscaba -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0
Wasn't there a recent change where the prerequisite version of gtk was
incremented? Try building for Qt or (as suggested) lazbuild only.
However unless you really need trunk I think you ought to be using
Lazarus 1.0 + FPC 2.6.0: there are still issues in later versions e.g.
http://mantis.freepascal.org/view.php?id=22463
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
