On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 13:11 +0200, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Oct 2012, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 11:55 +0200, Sven Barth wrote: > >> Am 10.10.2012 18:42, schrieb Florian Klämpfl: > >>> Am 10.10.2012 16:11, schrieb Bart: > >> I would even go into the opposite direction and adjust Delphi's > >> attribute syntax: > > > >> to a more Pascal like: > >> > >> === hypothetical example === > >> > >> type > >> TSomeClass = class > >> property SomeProperty {...} attributes [Some3rdAttribute('a', 'b')]; > >> end attributes [SomeAttribute(1, 2, 3), SomeOtherAttribute]; > >> > >> === hypothetical example === > > > > I don't know if you participated in the discussion about this feature > > before I started the first implementation. But we discussed this then. I > > decided not to do it, for the simple reason that I don't need it since > > I'm doing this for an application that has to be compiled by both Delphi > > and fpc. And as I was the one who implemented it, I had to decide. > > > > But feel free to add this syntax to objfpc mode. This can be done on the > > parser level only. And it's simpler then the 'Delphi' syntax as it does > > not need to remember the attribute until it parses the next statement. > > (Which is off course why the Delphi-class-attributes-syntax is not a > > Pascal syntax at all) > > > >> And if Joost isn't fast enough with his attributes branch I might do > >> that indeed ;P > > > > In fact that branch works completely, as far as I know. I have to add > > some more tests, and maybe some checks here and there. But the > > attributes do work. > > What stops you from merging this to trunk ?
The tests. I want to add those first. I'll do this next week. Joost. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus