Copied from the link http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/2014-February/085665.html:
Sure. I didn't mean to say that it's not usable, just that at the time when I looked for something (some years ago), it was simply not yet available. But, and please do not take this wrong, I would like to see some more demos on your website: At the moment, based on available examples, I simply don't see the advantage of using brook over plain fcl-web. If I look at the samples you currently provide, it looks like a thin layer on top of fcl-web, and fcl-db. I am biased, obviously, but I think that a newbie also needs more examples to see what brook can do for him/her. Michael. ----- Yes yes. Currently, Brook can offer you an excellent way for you to route your actions. Please, see this link: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/135304375/brookframework/doc/BrookAction.TBrookAction.html#Register Now, Brook also offers facility for a user to manage simple things like cookies, sessions, parameters in URLs (query_string) etc. Recently, middleware has been implemented, so it is now possible to define a rule in a constriant, and take it in multiple actions simultaneously (veri nice for validations, in static forms, databases etc.). There are several other news that would not show only in an email, for example, ease of debugging, using the newest broker for embedded server, created by Leledumbo. It was necessary to remove some old files in the project, including some demos because the final package was too large. But if someone wants to see them again to have a base of old and new implementations, it is available here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/135304375/brookframework/third-party.zip . -- Silvio Clécio My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus