On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:35:45 +0100 Bart <bartjun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>[...] > [X] True -> meaning is obvious > [ ] True -> suggests True is not selected, so value probably is False > [ ] False -> Meaning is ambiguous, to say the least. +1 > I still don't see why we cannot use a "read-only" combobox for these > kinde of properties. The argument that you cannot copy the value > anymore can easily be overcome. AFAIK this argument is for enums, not for boolean. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
