News: http://trolltech.com/products/qt/gplexception
But: B) You must, on request, make a complete package including the complete source code of Your Software... When BSD permits code closed, that is not a contradiction? 2007/8/8, Luis R. Hilario B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I know that since the principle. > > 2007/8/7, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Luis R. Hilario B. schreef: > > > Qt license. > > > > > > > You don't need a QT license to test the unicode support in windows using the > > win32/win64 interface. > > > > Vincent > > > > > 2007/8/6, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> On 8/6/07, Luis R. Hilario B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> The problem of the license (commercial) discourages me > > >> Which license are you talking about? > > >> > > >> My message is a specific call for testers on the unicode support for > > >> the win32/64 interface. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > > "unsubscribe" as the Subject > > archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives > > > > > -- > http://luisdigital.com > -- http://luisdigital.com _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
