Hi, Ouch, I see. I repacked the tarball using redhat, no file were modified, so I kept the version number.
Now I see the permissions have been truncated by Cygwin. Ok, since there are no source code changes I think I could use lcms-2.0a this time. I have some features in my schedule for 2.1, so I would prefer to keep in 2.0 right now. Any thoughts? Thanks for reporting! Regards Marti Quoting Bob Friesenhahn <[email protected]>: > On Fri, 14 May 2010, Volker Grabsch wrote: > >> The source tarball of lcms-2.0 contains some flawed file permissions. >> A quick check showed that "execute" permissions are missing for at >> least the following files: > > It seems that the tarball was produced under Cygwin, which does not > behave exactly the same as POSIX/Unix. Besides the lack of execute > bits, it seems that directory GIDs are extended 32-bit values which > don't work for all types of systems. > > Bob > -- > Bob Friesenhahn > [email protected], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ > GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Lcms-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
