Quoting Richard Hughes <[email protected]>:
>
> It seems someone else has hit this in production too[1] -- so it's not
> just my system. Could you consider the attached patch please?
I was going to add this to make rc3, but now I realize you want something like
cmsBool CMSEXPORT cmsDictAddEntry(cmsHANDLE hDict, const wchar_t* Name,
{
- _cmsAssert(Name != NULL);
+ if (Name == NULL) {
+ error blah blah
+ return false;
+ }
So my question is why not to check "Name" before calling
cmsDictAddEntry. If I add a check for a parameter in this function,
for consistency sake I should add similar checks on nearly all lcms
functions taking pointers. Please don't get me wrong, I would be glad
to add this if it is really necessary, but I feel it is like a
temporary hack, and would change the normal operation mode.
Ideas?
Regards
Marti
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Lcms-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
