Perfect , thank you everyone for your help
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Steffen Weiberle <Steffen.Weiberle at sun.com > wrote: > On 09/30/08 12:51, Brian Wroblewski wrote: > > What I did for my T5220s, is aggregate all 4 connections together and > just create one VSW. We didn't like using all the IP addresses needed to get > IPMP working on each LDOM. The aggregation also makes it much more > manageable to support. But it depends on what you want the end result to > look like and the flexibility of your Network support group. > > I'd say it depends as well. > > Aggregations require co-operation of the switch owner. IPMP requires > test addresses, since (I believe) port failures don't get passed on the > vswitch. > > It may be possible to use a test network for IPMP test addresses, if you > have other hosts also using IPMP and have that already set up. > > Steffen > > PS. Also, there is a new paper, > > http://wikis.sun.com/display/BluePrints/LDOMS+IO+Best+Practices+-+Network+Availability+With+Logical+Domains > > as well as one for disk I/O. > > > -- > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > > _______________________________________________ > > ldoms-discuss mailing list > > ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > ldoms-discuss mailing list > ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ldoms-discuss/attachments/20081001/54132310/attachment.html>
