On Mar 4, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Dmitriy Krayzman wrote: > Do you know if this fix will be back ported to Solaris 10 U4 as a > patch?
Not currently planned. If there is a escalation we can look into doing this. But current plan is to ask people to upgrade to U5. -Narayan > > Thank you, > D. > > Narayan Venkat wrote: >> Hi >> >> >> On Mar 4, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Dmitriy Krayzman wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> I'm trying to use aggregated link (built with dladm) as my network >>> device attached to the virtual >>> switch but don't believe it's working. While configuration part >>> works >>> without any errors, >>> jumpstarting guest domains fails. Replacing aggregated link with >>> simple interface e1000g0 works fine. >>> >>> Relevant info: >>> Solaris 10 U4 >>> T5220 >>> VSW >>> NAME MAC NET-DEV DEVICE MODE >>> primary-vsw0 00:14:4f:f8:f9:1d aggr1 switch at 0 >>> prog,promisc >>> >>> I found a bug 6531266 but status is fixed (assuming in Opensolaris). >> >> It is available in Nevada. I will be released as part of Solaris 10 >> U5. >> >>> Would it make sense to create two virtual switches attached to two >>> different physical interfaces and do link aggregation in a guest >>> domain? >> >> That is not supported currently. >> >> Thanks >> -Narayan >> >> > _______________________________________________ > ldoms-discuss mailing list > ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss
