On 02/04/10 12:21, Tony MacDoodle wrote: > Using LDom's 1.3...... This can be accomplished with VLAN Tagging of > both the vitrual switch and vnet? Correct? Correct. For the case you mentioned below, if only the guests need to be in those vlans, you don't need to assign the virtual switch to those vlans; you need to do that only if the virtual switch is also going to be plumbed in those vlans. -Harsha > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:10 PM, <Sriharsha.Basavapatna at sun.com > <mailto:Sriharsha.Basavapatna at sun.com>> wrote: > > On 02/04/10 12:00, Tony MacDoodle wrote: >> I have 2 Guest domains that access 2 different networks: >> 11.11.116.0 >> 11.11.117.0 >> >> Is it possible to route these 2 guest domain addresses through >> one virtual switch? This means 1 physical nic port will be mapped >> to a virtual switch and VLAN tagged? > Yes, possible if you are using LDoms 1.1 or above. > -Harsha >> >> IS this possible or do I have to stick with a 1:1 ratio of >> physical interfaces to network addresses? >> >> ie: >> e1000g0 - vsw0 - 11.11.116.0 >> e1000g1 - vsw1 - 11.11.117.0 >> >> Thanks >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ldoms-discuss mailing list >> ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org <mailto:ldoms-discuss at >> opensolaris.org> >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss >> > >
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ldoms-discuss/attachments/20100204/5dde4601/attachment.html>
